XC Vs. Track

The Classic Question.....Which IS Better?

Track

if you asked me a couple months ago i would have said track suck xc all the way
but I'm starting to enjoy track also
this year was my first year in track

I think I'm better at track but I like XC a lot better.

i think xc because theres more of a team aspect to it..... and your alot better friends with your teammates for xc compared to track

I made up my mind: xc

xctrackohion2012 wrote:i think xc because theres more of a team aspect to it..... and your alot better friends with your teammates for xc compared to track

+1 That and the fact that there's no sprinters.

FinishingKick wrote:

xctrackohion2012 wrote:i think xc because theres more of a team aspect to it..... and your alot better friends with your teammates for xc compared to track

+1 That and the fact that there's no sprinters.

sprinters are worthless..... they don't work

track.

xctrackohion2012 wrote:

FinishingKick wrote:

xctrackohion2012 wrote:i think xc because theres more of a team aspect to it..... and your alot better friends with your teammates for xc compared to track

+1 That and the fact that there's no sprinters.

sprinters are worthless..... they don't work

and i suppose a 20:54 5k is working?

TehNextTopMiler wrote:

xctrackohion2012 wrote:

FinishingKick wrote:

xctrackohion2012 wrote:i think xc because theres more of a team aspect to it..... and your alot better friends with your teammates for xc compared to track

+1 That and the fact that there's no sprinters.

sprinters are worthless..... they don't work

and i suppose a 20:54 5k is working?

Agreed, I know a lot of sprinters that probably work harder than you. Unfortunately only three are in my grade. We'll be really bad in 2011.

FinishingKick wrote:

TehNextTopMiler wrote:

xctrackohion2012 wrote:

FinishingKick wrote:

xctrackohion2012 wrote:i think xc because theres more of a team aspect to it..... and your alot better friends with your teammates for xc compared to track

+1 That and the fact that there's no sprinters.

sprinters are worthless..... they don't work

and i suppose a 20:54 5k is working?

Agreed, I know a lot of sprinters that probably work harder than you. Unfortunately only three are in my grade. We'll be really bad in 2011.

yea, the sprinters at my school work pretty hard.

TehNextTopMiler wrote:

FinishingKick wrote:

TehNextTopMiler wrote:

xctrackohion2012 wrote:

FinishingKick wrote:

xctrackohion2012 wrote:i think xc because theres more of a team aspect to it..... and your alot better friends with your teammates for xc compared to track

+1 That and the fact that there's no sprinters.

sprinters are worthless..... they don't work

and i suppose a 20:54 5k is working?

Agreed, I know a lot of sprinters that probably work harder than you. Unfortunately only three are in my grade. We'll be really bad in 2011.

yea, the sprinters at my school work pretty hard.

the 20:54 isn't my fault..... i'm only gonna be a freshman this coming year and this was my first year of distance and we don't even have the 3200m.... i know i can do alot better i've ran 12:16 3200m

xctrackohion2012 wrote:

TehNextTopMiler wrote:

FinishingKick wrote:

TehNextTopMiler wrote:

xctrackohion2012 wrote:

FinishingKick wrote:

xctrackohion2012 wrote:i think xc because theres more of a team aspect to it..... and your alot better friends with your teammates for xc compared to track

+1 That and the fact that there's no sprinters.

sprinters are worthless..... they don't work

and i suppose a 20:54 5k is working?

Agreed, I know a lot of sprinters that probably work harder than you. Unfortunately only three are in my grade. We'll be really bad in 2011.

yea, the sprinters at my school work pretty hard.

the 20:54 isn't my fault..... i'm only gonna be a freshman this coming year and this was my first year of distance and we don't even have the 3200m.... i know i can do alot better i've ran 12:16 3200m

that 12:16 isn't too hot either buddy.

he is only in 8th grade

Running With Scissors wrote:he is only in 8th grade

and? if he's trashing all sprinters he better be running 11 flat. 12:16 is a mediocre time for 8th anyway, i ran an 11:39 in 8th.

but just because he is slow doesn't mean he isn't give his all

yea i'm sorry that this past year was only my first season of distance....

---this thread

Running With Scissors wrote: ---this thread

Agreed, we need to get back on topic.

xctrackohion2012 wrote:yea i'm sorry that this past year was only my first season of distance....

that'sa still bad for over a year of training.

FinishingKick wrote:

Running With Scissors wrote: ---this thread

Agreed, we need to get back on topic.

ey, if he wants to trash other people than i'll trash him.

TehNextTopMiler wrote:

FinishingKick wrote:

Running With Scissors wrote: ---this thread

Agreed, we need to get back on topic.

ey, if he wants to trash other people than i'll trash him.

So by your logic the whole forum should be trashing you now.

xc is better than track

FinishingKick wrote:

TehNextTopMiler wrote:

FinishingKick wrote:

Running With Scissors wrote: ---this thread

Agreed, we need to get back on topic.

ey, if he wants to trash other people than i'll trash him.

So by your logic the whole forum should be trashing you now.

name the last time i trashed someone for not working hard.