Home
lolProtestTheZero wrote:You guys should DEFINITELY date.RawBeginner wrote:ProtestTheZero wrote:You guys should date :/
You should break 5
+15
eternally_running
Just Because
amherst_xc
XC_crazy
xotrackkgirl
P2
T B K
*sg*
Running With Scissors
Phuckduck
NotChangingUntilSub5
hxc
AudienceOfOne
Pinthin
ButterySmoothStride
19 posters
Religion is a neurosis
AudienceOfOne- Admin
- Number of posts : 5377
Age : 32
Location : Nati fo eva
Class : 2011
3200m Time : 10:17
Registration date : 2008-05-24
ButterySmoothStride- Pro
- Number of posts : 427
Registration date : 2008-06-19
*sg* wrote:AudienceOfOne wrote:again, science does not prove evolution. if you can't see past what we know as humans then you're ignorant because we obviously don't know everything, we're not even remotely close to knowing everything.SourWorms wrote:AudienceOfOne wrote:and that's what makes him ignorant, he couldn't see or believe anything past the science.SourWorms wrote:ending the quote train...
but how does that make einstein ignorant? there were no facts that suggested a god to him, and thus he did not believe it
how does that make him ignorant? i would call the people who do not believe in evolution ignorant because they will not accept science right before their eyes. but einstein never saw any proof of god or a reason for a god, so that sounds more analytical than ignorant to me.
actually, +1. evolution is a theory. It isn't proved. It's just the most logical explanation given the observations that have been made. and +1 about the ignorance part. I think the problem is that people aren't willing to accept the fact that they don't know for sure, and may never know.
to be honest evolution is not a theory. ievolution is the fact that gene pools change over time, which they do. we can put bacteria in a petri dish and watch them evolve, thus proving that evolution exists. I'm serious, we can prove evolution exists easily. It's called "Darwin's Theory of Evolution" because he tries to define the mechanisms which drive evolution. he proposed "natural selection." natural selection is a theory(for all we know it's God behind it all, or the boogey man, or maybe it's magic), but evolution itself is a fact, gene pools are constantly changing.
Phuckduck- All-Pro
- Number of posts : 681
Registration date : 2008-07-06
RawBeginner wrote:*sg* wrote:AudienceOfOne wrote:again, science does not prove evolution. if you can't see past what we know as humans then you're ignorant because we obviously don't know everything, we're not even remotely close to knowing everything.SourWorms wrote:AudienceOfOne wrote:and that's what makes him ignorant, he couldn't see or believe anything past the science.SourWorms wrote:ending the quote train...
but how does that make einstein ignorant? there were no facts that suggested a god to him, and thus he did not believe it
how does that make him ignorant? i would call the people who do not believe in evolution ignorant because they will not accept science right before their eyes. but einstein never saw any proof of god or a reason for a god, so that sounds more analytical than ignorant to me.
actually, +1. evolution is a theory. It isn't proved. It's just the most logical explanation given the observations that have been made. and +1 about the ignorance part. I think the problem is that people aren't willing to accept the fact that they don't know for sure, and may never know.
to be honest evolution is not a theory. ievolution is the fact that gene pools change over time, which they do. we can put bacteria in a petri dish and watch them evolve, thus proving that evolution exists. I'm serious, we can prove evolution exists easily. It's called "Darwin's Theory of Evolution" because he tries to define the mechanisms which drive evolution. he proposed "natural selection." natural selection is a theory(for all we know it's God behind it all, or the boogey man, or maybe it's magic), but evolution itself is a fact, gene pools are constantly changing.
amen
FinishingKick- Admin
- Number of posts : 4773
Age : 31
Location : New York
Mile Time : 4:52
Class : Sophomore
800m Time : 2:10
5000m XC Time : 17:29
1000m Time : 2:50
Registration date : 2008-05-22
RawBeginner wrote:How many times does this need to be said?*sg* wrote:AudienceOfOne wrote:again, science does not prove evolution. if you can't see past what we know as humans then you're ignorant because we obviously don't know everything, we're not even remotely close to knowing everything.SourWorms wrote:AudienceOfOne wrote:and that's what makes him ignorant, he couldn't see or believe anything past the science.SourWorms wrote:ending the quote train...
but how does that make einstein ignorant? there were no facts that suggested a god to him, and thus he did not believe it
how does that make him ignorant? i would call the people who do not believe in evolution ignorant because they will not accept science right before their eyes. but einstein never saw any proof of god or a reason for a god, so that sounds more analytical than ignorant to me.
actually, +1. evolution is a theory. It isn't proved. It's just the most logical explanation given the observations that have been made. and +1 about the ignorance part. I think the problem is that people aren't willing to accept the fact that they don't know for sure, and may never know.
to be honest evolution is not a theory. ievolution is the fact that gene pools change over time, which they do. we can put bacteria in a petri dish and watch them evolve, thus proving that evolution exists. I'm serious, we can prove evolution exists easily. It's called "Darwin's Theory of Evolution" because he tries to define the mechanisms which drive evolution. he proposed "natural selection." natural selection is a theory(for all we know it's God behind it all, or the boogey man, or maybe it's magic), but evolution itself is a fact, gene pools are constantly changing.
Similar topics
