Audience got butthurt

Alright I'm not explaining this 3 times. I'm going to eat some pizza because you're just annoying.

AudienceOfOne wrote:A question to the atheists, and people who believe in the big bang theory: You say the universe was formed when a ball of energy/mass, whatever, exploded and created the universe, right? Where did that ball come from?

(btw, I'm not really even trying to argue here, just want to know what you think.)

why can't that mass have always been there in compliance with the laws of physics. therefore the universe is in a constant state of flux, as is proven, constantly expanding and imploding

and you still never answered, what are your views on Mohammed

FinishingKick wrote:

AudeinceOfOne wrote:

AudienceOfOne wrote:

AudeinceOfOne wrote:

AudienceOfOne wrote:

AudeinceOfOne wrote:

AudienceOfOne wrote:

Red R1der wrote:Okay I just skimmed through the entire topic. I'm so glad I didn't check that worthless post as it developed day by day.

Atleast I know I did something right if I made the 3 main ignorant atheists angry.

quite ironic that you call us ignorant when you believe that a man in the sky created everything you see today in 6 days

And you believe nothing can exist beyond what we can see.

By the way, you spelled "audience" wrong.

well, i believe wind exists, i can't see it. and i believe there are probably millions of earth like planets because it is just inevitable. but again i cannot see them. but anything beyond perception that violates science doesn't exist.

andd are you serious about now?

You know what I meant. You think anything that science can't prove can't be real, which isn't true.

except it is true...i don't get what you mean by asserting that because i cant prove it, means it exists. then by that logic, invisible pink unicorns could very well be running around inside my house and i would never know it?

so i am guessing that if i were to ask you about Vishnu, you would say that he does not exist, and is only a figment of people's imaginations?

Actually that's only by your perception. When atoms weren't discovered it didn't mean they weren't real, we just hadn't proved their existence yet.

No one ever responds to my posts on these threads.

FinishingKick wrote:

FinishingKick wrote:

AudeinceOfOne wrote:

AudienceOfOne wrote:

AudeinceOfOne wrote:

AudienceOfOne wrote:

AudeinceOfOne wrote:

AudienceOfOne wrote:

Red R1der wrote:Okay I just skimmed through the entire topic. I'm so glad I didn't check that worthless post as it developed day by day.

Atleast I know I did something right if I made the 3 main ignorant atheists angry.

quite ironic that you call us ignorant when you believe that a man in the sky created everything you see today in 6 days

And you believe nothing can exist beyond what we can see.

By the way, you spelled "audience" wrong.

well, i believe wind exists, i can't see it. and i believe there are probably millions of earth like planets because it is just inevitable. but again i cannot see them. but anything beyond perception that violates science doesn't exist.

andd are you serious about now?

You know what I meant. You think anything that science can't prove can't be real, which isn't true.

except it is true...i don't get what you mean by asserting that because i cant prove it, means it exists. then by that logic, invisible pink unicorns could very well be running around inside my house and i would never know it?

so i am guessing that if i were to ask you about Vishnu, you would say that he does not exist, and is only a figment of people's imaginations?

Actually that's only by your perception. When atoms weren't discovered it didn't mean they weren't real, we just hadn't proved their existence yet.

No one ever responds to my posts on these threads.

well you just basically agreed with me. but science proved atoms, science will never prove something that doesn't exist, ergo god

just because he made the Declaration of Independence that way, does not mean the founding fathers would be proud of catholic lobbyists being douchebags.

hahaha

the universe is in a constant state of flux, as is proven, constantly expanding and imploding

AudeinceOfOne wrote:

AudienceOfOne wrote:A question to the atheists, and people who believe in the big bang theory: You say the universe was formed when a ball of energy/mass, whatever, exploded and created the universe, right? Where did that ball come from?

(btw, I'm not really even trying to argue here, just want to know what you think.)

why can't that mass have always been there in compliance with the laws of physics. therefore the universe is in a constant state of flux, as is proven, constantly expanding and imploding

and you still never answered, what are your views on Mohammed

i don't know enough about islam or mohammed to have an opinion on him.

AudeinceOfOne wrote:

AudienceOfOne wrote:A question to the atheists, and people who believe in the big bang theory: You say the universe was formed when a ball of energy/mass, whatever, exploded and created the universe, right? Where did that ball come from?

(btw, I'm not really even trying to argue here, just want to know what you think.)

why can't that mass have always been there in compliance with the laws of physics. therefore the universe is in a constant state of flux, as is proven, constantly expanding and imploding

and you still never answered, what are your views on Mohammed

I have a friend named mohammed. He's a nice guy.

AudienceOfOne wrote:No, probably not. There are references to God in the Constitution/Bill of Rights/Decalaration of Independence to God. And I'm pretty sure most historians consider most of the founding fathers to have believed in a God.

Oh yeah for sure, I don't deny that at all. And I don't know for sure, but I'd guess that the founding fathers didn't want to create a nation where you had to pledge allegiance to god in order to become a citizen. Maybe I'm wrong?

AudienceOfOne wrote:

AudeinceOfOne wrote:

AudienceOfOne wrote:A question to the atheists, and people who believe in the big bang theory: You say the universe was formed when a ball of energy/mass, whatever, exploded and created the universe, right? Where did that ball come from?

(btw, I'm not really even trying to argue here, just want to know what you think.)

why can't that mass have always been there in compliance with the laws of physics. therefore the universe is in a constant state of flux, as is proven, constantly expanding and imploding

and you still never answered, what are your views on Mohammed

i don't know enough about islam or mohammed to have an opinion on him.

ohhh okay, well he actually rose to heaven just like Jesus

AudeinceOfOne wrote:

AudienceOfOne wrote:

AudeinceOfOne wrote:

AudienceOfOne wrote:A question to the atheists, and people who believe in the big bang theory: You say the universe was formed when a ball of energy/mass, whatever, exploded and created the universe, right? Where did that ball come from?

(btw, I'm not really even trying to argue here, just want to know what you think.)

why can't that mass have always been there in compliance with the laws of physics. therefore the universe is in a constant state of flux, as is proven, constantly expanding and imploding

and you still never answered, what are your views on Mohammed

i don't know enough about islam or mohammed to have an opinion on him.

ohhh okay, well he actually rose to heaven just like Jesus

Well, I think it's safe to say that's wrong then.

thelagwagon wrote:

AudienceOfOne wrote:No, probably not. There are references to God in the Constitution/Bill of Rights/Decalaration of Independence to God. And I'm pretty sure most historians consider most of the founding fathers to have believed in a God.

Oh yeah for sure, I don't deny that at all. And I don't know for sure, but I'd guess that the founding fathers didn't want to create a nation where you had to pledge allegiance to god in order to become a citizen. Maybe I'm wrong?

You might have a point there, but no one has been denied citizenship because of their religion.

Well, I think it's safe to say that's wrong then.

Did anybody see Jesus fly away to heaven either? Negatory. Just like everything else in your religion, you like to assume that there are supernatural powers and higher beings because a book said so. J.K. Rowling was legit imo, why can't there be a school for wizards somewhere?

science will never prove something that doesn't exist, ergo god

what if they could prove jesus was a fraud?

AudeinceOfOne wrote:

FinishingKick wrote:

FinishingKick wrote:

AudeinceOfOne wrote:

AudienceOfOne wrote:

AudeinceOfOne wrote:

AudienceOfOne wrote:

AudeinceOfOne wrote:

AudienceOfOne wrote:

Red R1der wrote:Okay I just skimmed through the entire topic. I'm so glad I didn't check that worthless post as it developed day by day.

Atleast I know I did something right if I made the 3 main ignorant atheists angry.

quite ironic that you call us ignorant when you believe that a man in the sky created everything you see today in 6 days

And you believe nothing can exist beyond what we can see.

By the way, you spelled "audience" wrong.

well, i believe wind exists, i can't see it. and i believe there are probably millions of earth like planets because it is just inevitable. but again i cannot see them. but anything beyond perception that violates science doesn't exist.

andd are you serious about now?

You know what I meant. You think anything that science can't prove can't be real, which isn't true.

except it is true...i don't get what you mean by asserting that because i cant prove it, means it exists. then by that logic, invisible pink unicorns could very well be running around inside my house and i would never know it?

so i am guessing that if i were to ask you about Vishnu, you would say that he does not exist, and is only a figment of people's imaginations?

Actually that's only by your perception. When atoms weren't discovered it didn't mean they weren't real, we just hadn't proved their existence yet.

No one ever responds to my posts on these threads.

well you just basically agreed with me. but science proved atoms, science will never prove something that doesn't exist, ergo god

One way or another it will be proven to you after you die. This is the same as how you would prove the Big Bng Theory (only in the future not the past).

One way or another it will be proven to you after you die. This is the same as how you would prove the Big Bng Theory (only in the future not the past).

How is it that christians don't notice it is incoherent babbling morons like this who most ardently defend christianity?

wait, nevermind, I know the answer

Somehow I think it's easier to determine the past than it is the future. It is FK's logic that explains the only way to know if anything in the Bible is even true.

AudienceOfOne wrote:

AudeinceOfOne wrote:

AudienceOfOne wrote:

AudeinceOfOne wrote:

AudienceOfOne wrote:A question to the atheists, and people who believe in the big bang theory: You say the universe was formed when a ball of energy/mass, whatever, exploded and created the universe, right? Where did that ball come from?

(btw, I'm not really even trying to argue here, just want to know what you think.)

why can't that mass have always been there in compliance with the laws of physics. therefore the universe is in a constant state of flux, as is proven, constantly expanding and imploding

and you still never answered, what are your views on Mohammed

i don't know enough about islam or mohammed to have an opinion on him.

ohhh okay, well he actually rose to heaven just like Jesus

Well, I think it's safe to say that's wrong then.

Why? It is the exact same thing as Jesus, yet you believe there was a white dude with a mexican name in Israel that rose to heaven as opposed to a Muslim guy who did the same thing. pretty epic fail if you ask me

anyone see "Religulous"?

And to add more flames to this thread for fun:

"And the day will come when the mystical generation of Jesus, by the supreme being as his father in the womb of a virgin will be classed with the fable of the generation of Minerva in the brain of Jupiter. But may we hope that the dawn of reason and freedom of thought in these United States will do away with this artificial scaffolding, and restore to us the primitive and genuine doctrines of this most venerated reformer of human errors." –Thomas Jefferson
"Lighthouses are more useful than churches." - Benjamin Franklin
"Religions are all alike – founded upon fables and mythologies." –Thomas Jefferson

XCTrackXC wrote:anyone see "Religulous"?

I did.

T B K wrote:

XCTrackXC wrote:anyone see "Religulous"?

I did.

I love the creation museum part...the dinosaurs roaming around the city/people..
and the scientology/mormon part

CT Track wrote:

Well, I think it's safe to say that's wrong then.

Did anybody see Jesus fly away to heaven either? Negatory. Just like everything else in your religion, you like to assume that there are supernatural powers and higher beings because a book said so. J.K. Rowling was legit imo, why can't there be a school for wizards somewhere?

Actually they did, check Acts 1.

And the "Jesus is as credible as Santa Claus" comments are getting annoying. Do we have pictures or the used coke can of Jesus? No. But we have thousands of manusripts and copies and scrolls of the bible dating back to the first and second centuries. Thousands. Those people and scribes were copied down from the latest manuscripts at the time, and those manuscripts were copied down by scribes and people looking at the earlier manuscripts, and so on until you get back to the original Gospels, all written at or before 80 AD.

That's something you don't have with santa claus or harry potter.

AudeinceOfOne wrote:

AudienceOfOne wrote:

AudeinceOfOne wrote:

AudienceOfOne wrote:

AudeinceOfOne wrote:

AudienceOfOne wrote:A question to the atheists, and people who believe in the big bang theory: You say the universe was formed when a ball of energy/mass, whatever, exploded and created the universe, right? Where did that ball come from?

(btw, I'm not really even trying to argue here, just want to know what you think.)

why can't that mass have always been there in compliance with the laws of physics. therefore the universe is in a constant state of flux, as is proven, constantly expanding and imploding

and you still never answered, what are your views on Mohammed

i don't know enough about islam or mohammed to have an opinion on him.

ohhh okay, well he actually rose to heaven just like Jesus

Well, I think it's safe to say that's wrong then.

Why? It is the exact same thing as Jesus, yet you believe there was a white dude with a mexican name in Israel that rose to heaven as opposed to a Muslim guy who did the same thing. pretty epic fail if you ask me

Like I said, I'm not very educated in Islam. But I do know that the Qur'ran is at best a 4rth or 5th hand account, something even admitted by many muslims. That doesn't sound very reliable to me.

Also, Islamic texts are very contradictory when it comes to Jesus. That is not exactly a book I would base my life around right there.

Adonai wrote:

One way or another it will be proven to you after you die. This is the same as how you would prove the Big Bng Theory (only in the future not the past).

How is it that christians don't notice it is incoherent babbling morons like this who most ardently defend christianity?

wait, nevermind, I know the answer

Haha, yea, atleast Christians can have an argument without an insult or a comment about how superior you are in every post. No offense to the atheist like wgrt that can actually have a productive argument without trying to blaze on somebody.