Audience got butthurt

AudeinceOfOne wrote:

AudienceOfOne wrote:

AudeinceOfOne wrote:

AudienceOfOne wrote:

Red R1der wrote:Okay I just skimmed through the entire topic. I'm so glad I didn't check that worthless post as it developed day by day.

Atleast I know I did something right if I made the 3 main ignorant atheists angry.

quite ironic that you call us ignorant when you believe that a man in the sky created everything you see today in 6 days

And you believe nothing can exist beyond what we can see.

By the way, you spelled "audience" wrong.

well, i believe wind exists, i can't see it. and i believe there are probably millions of earth like planets because it is just inevitable. but again i cannot see them. but anything beyond perception that violates science doesn't exist.

andd are you serious about now?

he never said he didn't believe in a totally transcendent force or god
just that he disagrees with some christian beliefs
20% of americans still don't believe the earth orbits the sun
50% of americans don't believe that we evolved

and happy 2009 everyone

Wgrt wrote:

AudeinceOfOne wrote:

AudienceOfOne wrote:

AudeinceOfOne wrote:

AudienceOfOne wrote:

Red R1der wrote:Okay I just skimmed through the entire topic. I'm so glad I didn't check that worthless post as it developed day by day.

Atleast I know I did something right if I made the 3 main ignorant atheists angry.

quite ironic that you call us ignorant when you believe that a man in the sky created everything you see today in 6 days

And you believe nothing can exist beyond what we can see.

By the way, you spelled "audience" wrong.

well, i believe wind exists, i can't see it. and i believe there are probably millions of earth like planets because it is just inevitable. but again i cannot see them. but anything beyond perception that violates science doesn't exist.

andd are you serious about now?

he never said he didn't believe in a totally transcendent force or god
just that he disagrees with some christian beliefs
20% of americans still don't believe the earth orbits the sun
50% of americans don't believe that we evolved

and happy 2009 everyone

yep so 50% of americans are effin retarded

"Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too? " -- Douglas Adams

CT Track wrote:I think the green fairy exists. At least people have SEEN that.

yea, he's on those lucky charm commercials

alex-likes-running wrote:

CT Track wrote:I think the green fairy exists. At least people have SEEN that.

yea, he's on those lucky charm commercials

I think he was talking about absinthe, unless you're being sarcastic. Hmm I cant tell.

haha pink unicorns, my brother bought one of those shirts to make his super religous ex angry .. she's above him.

AODS

Red R1der wrote:You guys realize you argue over this bullshit constantly as if you'll change anyone's opinion when in actuality you never will right?

You're so smart.

Pinthin wrote:

alex-likes-running wrote:

CT Track wrote:I think the green fairy exists. At least people have SEEN that.

yea, he's on those lucky charm commercials

I think he was talking about absinthe, unless you're being sarcastic. Hmm I cant tell.

haha pink unicorns, my brother bought one of those shirts to make his super religous ex angry .. she's above him.

lol yea, i was just joking. i knew what he is referring to, but leprechauns are funnier

alex-likes-running wrote:

Pinthin wrote:

alex-likes-running wrote:

CT Track wrote:I think the green fairy exists. At least people have SEEN that.

yea, he's on those lucky charm commercials

I think he was talking about absinthe, unless you're being sarcastic. Hmm I cant tell.

haha pink unicorns, my brother bought one of those shirts to make his super religous ex angry .. she's above him.

lol yea, i was just joking. i knew what he is referring to, but leprechauns are funnier

except that "horror" movie about a leprechaun.. That freaked me out for a week

Red R1der wrote:You guys realize you argue over this bullshit constantly as if you'll change anyone's opinion when in actuality you never will right?

best post of 2008

the sentence structure, the wording, the delivery, makes this post just perfect

Adonai wrote:"Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too? " -- Douglas Adams

This is a really good quote
+1

AudeinceOfOne wrote:

AudienceOfOne wrote:

AudeinceOfOne wrote:

AudienceOfOne wrote:

AudeinceOfOne wrote:

AudienceOfOne wrote:

Red R1der wrote:Okay I just skimmed through the entire topic. I'm so glad I didn't check that worthless post as it developed day by day.

Atleast I know I did something right if I made the 3 main ignorant atheists angry.

quite ironic that you call us ignorant when you believe that a man in the sky created everything you see today in 6 days

And you believe nothing can exist beyond what we can see.

By the way, you spelled "audience" wrong.

well, i believe wind exists, i can't see it. and i believe there are probably millions of earth like planets because it is just inevitable. but again i cannot see them. but anything beyond perception that violates science doesn't exist.

andd are you serious about now?

You know what I meant. You think anything that science can't prove can't be real, which isn't true.

except it is true...i don't get what you mean by asserting that because i cant prove it, means it exists. then by that logic, invisible pink unicorns could very well be running around inside my house and i would never know it?

so i am guessing that if i were to ask you about Vishnu, you would say that he does not exist, and is only a figment of people's imaginations?

No, you don't understand. Back in 1300 AD science wasn't advanced enough to prove the earth was round or to discover things about the human biological system. Saying science can now prove everything is very ignorant.

And yes, Vishnu is an idol.

Yes and thanks to the Enlightenment we now can safely say that everything can be proved with science, even if we haven't fully comprehended it yet. All you are saying to us is that because we couldn't understand everything back then, God was relevant. Kind of null and void nowadays isn't it.

Red R1der wrote:You guys realize you argue over this bullshit constantly as if you'll change anyone's opinion when in actuality you never will right?

I'm not so much doing it to change the people who I'm arguing with's mind as I am for the people who are just reading it.

CT Track wrote:Yes and thanks to the Enlightenment we now can safely say that everything can be proved with science, even if we haven't fully comprehended it yet. All you are saying to us is that because we couldn't understand everything back then, God was relevant. Kind of null and void nowadays isn't it.

You actually think that everything can be figured out with science now? Seriously? We've been on the earth many thousands of years, and throughout those years you can find quotes from people who have said that science has reached everything, and everything that can be proved has been proved. Are you really ignorant enough to be one of those people that are laughed at by future generations because they thought that?

AudeinceOfOne wrote:

Red R1der wrote:You guys realize you argue over this bullshit constantly as if you'll change anyone's opinion when in actuality you never will right?

best post of 2008

the sentence structure, the wording, the delivery, makes this post just perfect

LOL, it takes 2 people to argue, man.

AudienceOfOne wrote:

CT Track wrote:Yes and thanks to the Enlightenment we now can safely say that everything can be proved with science, even if we haven't fully comprehended it yet. All you are saying to us is that because we couldn't understand everything back then, God was relevant. Kind of null and void nowadays isn't it.

You actually think that everything can be figured out with science now? Seriously? We've been on the earth many thousands of years, and throughout those years you can find quotes from people who have said that science has reached everything, and everything that can be proved has been proved. Are you really ignorant enough to be one of those people that are laughed at by future generations because they thought that?

I must be, because I didn't understand what you're trying to get across. You're a crazy fence hopper.

Might I add that I just can't take you and your Greg Oden avatar serious.

[quote="AudienceOfOne"][quote="AudeinceOfOne"]

AudienceOfOne wrote:
No, you don't understand. Back in 1300 AD science wasn't advanced enough to prove the earth was round or to discover things about the human biological system. Saying science can now prove everything is very ignorant.

Incorrect. The ancient Greeks knew the world was round. They knew because when they were out on the ocean, you could see the top of a ship's sails before the rest of the ship. This knowledge wasn't entirely lost in the middle ages either, but it wasn't exactly kept. The Arabs knew the world was round throughout their history.

CT Track wrote:

AudienceOfOne wrote:

CT Track wrote:Yes and thanks to the Enlightenment we now can safely say that everything can be proved with science, even if we haven't fully comprehended it yet. All you are saying to us is that because we couldn't understand everything back then, God was relevant. Kind of null and void nowadays isn't it.

You actually think that everything can be figured out with science now? Seriously? We've been on the earth many thousands of years, and throughout those years you can find quotes from people who have said that science has reached everything, and everything that can be proved has been proved. Are you really ignorant enough to be one of those people that are laughed at by future generations because they thought that?

I must be, because I didn't understand what you're trying to get across. You're a crazy fence hopper.

I haven't changed any of my opinions.

CT Track wrote:Might I add that I just can't take you and your Greg Oden avatar serious.

That's Haile Gebrselassie, the greatest distance runner ever, and a Christian.

AudienceOfOne wrote:

CT Track wrote:Might I add that I just can't take you and your Greg Oden avatar serious.

That's Haile Gebrselassie, the greatest distance runner ever, and a Christian.

he's lucky god made him so fast. without god he would be utter crap

AudienceOfOne wrote:

AudeinceOfOne wrote:

AudienceOfOne wrote:

AudeinceOfOne wrote:

AudienceOfOne wrote:

AudeinceOfOne wrote:

AudienceOfOne wrote:

Red R1der wrote:Okay I just skimmed through the entire topic. I'm so glad I didn't check that worthless post as it developed day by day.

Atleast I know I did something right if I made the 3 main ignorant atheists angry.

quite ironic that you call us ignorant when you believe that a man in the sky created everything you see today in 6 days

And you believe nothing can exist beyond what we can see.

By the way, you spelled "audience" wrong.

well, i believe wind exists, i can't see it. and i believe there are probably millions of earth like planets because it is just inevitable. but again i cannot see them. but anything beyond perception that violates science doesn't exist.

andd are you serious about now?

You know what I meant. You think anything that science can't prove can't be real, which isn't true.

except it is true...i don't get what you mean by asserting that because i cant prove it, means it exists. then by that logic, invisible pink unicorns could very well be running around inside my house and i would never know it?

so i am guessing that if i were to ask you about Vishnu, you would say that he does not exist, and is only a figment of people's imaginations?

No, you don't understand. Back in 1300 AD science wasn't advanced enough to prove the earth was round or to discover things about the human biological system. Saying science can now prove everything is very ignorant.

And yes, Vishnu is an idol.

oh okay, same thing with mohammed?

AudienceOfOne wrote:

CT Track wrote:

AudienceOfOne wrote:

CT Track wrote:Yes and thanks to the Enlightenment we now can safely say that everything can be proved with science, even if we haven't fully comprehended it yet. All you are saying to us is that because we couldn't understand everything back then, God was relevant. Kind of null and void nowadays isn't it.

You actually think that everything can be figured out with science now? Seriously? We've been on the earth many thousands of years, and throughout those years you can find quotes from people who have said that science has reached everything, and everything that can be proved has been proved. Are you really ignorant enough to be one of those people that are laughed at by future generations because they thought that?

I must be, because I didn't understand what you're trying to get across. You're a crazy fence hopper.

I haven't changed any of my opinions.

Oh so the ignorant is calling someone ignorant. Now you have made your point very clear.

I like him better.