but anyway, for me it's mason.
15:02,16:01,16:02,16:03,16:05
full 5k?baby got track wrote:
but a couple of years ago they had a girl run 14:49
I think so, but I'm not positive.XCTrackXC wrote:full 5k?baby got track wrote:
but a couple of years ago they had a girl run 14:49
i'll bet it was less than 3 miles. there's no way it was even three miles.XCTrackXC wrote:full 5k?baby got track wrote:
but a couple of years ago they had a girl run 14:49
Ha yeah you're right, it was 2.5. The school's website conviniently forgets to mention that at the hopes of seeming better than they actually are. This girls best 5k was only like 17:30ish.AudienceOfOne wrote:i'll bet it was less than 3 miles. there's no way it was even three miles.XCTrackXC wrote:full 5k?baby got track wrote:
but a couple of years ago they had a girl run 14:49
SourWorms wrote:buchanan, average team time 15:38...wtf
TRI_Love_518 wrote:Definitely Carmel. At a huge invitational, they had all their runners in the top 5 -- both boys and girls races. He boys averaged 16:30 and the girls averaged 18:30.
Are you kidding? Carmel is legit this year. The bestteam I've ever run against is my team. Other than that it would be Burnt Hills (2nd in the state) because this year's dual meets are the only times I've ever run against varsity teams. At the freshmen level there was a really fast team at Manhattan last year we lost to.amherst_xc wrote:TRI_Love_518 wrote:Definitely Carmel. At a huge invitational, they had all their runners in the top 5 -- both boys and girls races. He boys averaged 16:30 and the girls averaged 18:30.
WEAK
the girls are better.amherst_xc wrote:TRI_Love_518 wrote:Definitely Carmel. At a huge invitational, they had all their runners in the top 5 -- both boys and girls races. He boys averaged 16:30 and the girls averaged 18:30.
WEAK